You've finished the book, you've checked it for errors until your eyes are crossed. Your work is perfect... or is it?
I'd like to give a very warm welcome today to Julia Gibbs. When I first 'met' Julia on Twitter, I actually thought her name was Julia Proofreader (her Twitter handle). It was only when I started to read some of her informative blog posts, that I realised proofreading was her profession not her surname! I am really pleased that Julia has managed to find some time out of her very busy day to answer my questions, so over to you Julia.
How
long have you been a proofreader and what made you choose this profession?
At the risk of sounding
clichéd, I didn't choose it, it chose me! I have always had my nose in a book
from the time I learned to read, and I sailed through all English language and
literature exams at school. I worked for some years for a firm of architects and found that everyone came to me for spelling and grammar
advice; when the chief architect ruled that no document was to leave the office
without being passed by me, I thought to myself, 'Hang on, I could do this for
a living!' So to answer your question, I think I've been doing it for most of
my life.
Are
you a writer as well as a proofreader?
Good heavens, no! I don't know
how you authors do it, I really don't. I could no more write a novel than I
could run a marathon (PS, I don't run.) I can write blog posts, though, but I
think my creativity expires after about a page and a half.
What’s
the difference between a proofreader and an editor?
There is a difference between
proofreading and editing fiction. Not every writer requires an editor, by the
way, there is a minority who can edit their own work. Editors will perform
services such as: suggesting cutting out characters; changing or omitting
dialogue; changing the narrative arc of the novel; moving chapters around;
various other suggestions that will in their opinion improve the book. I don’t
alter the writer’s work apart from correcting it, although I will point out
anomalies of plot if I notice them, and any other inconsistencies (this is copy
editing, and goes above and beyond what a proofreader does, but I like to do it
as well). I will also make other suggestions if, for example, I see a word or
phrase repeated too often in a paragraph.
Why
can’t we writers just edit our own work?
You
can, if you like. Some writers (a minority, as I said) are capable of being
sufficiently dispassionate to edit their own work. But nobody can proofread
their own work. Here's why: when you read what you have written, you see what
you expect to see. In a sentence of 10 words, the mind actually reads the 1st,
5th and 10th words, and then makes sense of the rest of
it on its own. I've proofread books by authors who've been pretty confident
that they've been through their own work thoroughly and reckon that I might, if
I'm good, find 30 or 40 errors. I've found on average 600 and upwards. You'd be
surprised, as were some of my clients, see what they say here: Happy Customers
Do you only need a proofreader if you’re
self-publishing?
If you have been accepted by a publishing company, whether mainstream or indie,
then they will provide a proofreader for you, as part of the service. However,
I have recently worked for a client who had 6 novels published by Random House,
and wanted me to check his work before he sent his latest book to them, as he
thought he'd written it in a hurry. (He was right to do so, I found over 1,500
errors.)
What are the most common mistakes you see writers
making?
Most
errors are typos – that is, mistakes made through inattention while the writer
is in creative flow mode, and not caused by ignorance of spelling or
punctuation. And most of these are punctuation, with people not realising that
they've missed out commas or full stops because they're focussing on their
characters or story line. That's where a non-creative pedant like me is so
necessary, you see!
Some
of the spelling typos result in hilarious misunderstandings, and I am currently
compiling a list of the funniest ones I've come across, so that I can put them
in a blog post – with the authors' permission, of course!
How
long does it take you to proofread an average length novel?
Depends
on how many mistakes I have to correct. My clients' books run the full gamut,
from a few changes per paragraph, to one or two per chapter. On the other hand,
some people say to me, 'this shouldn't take you too long, it's already been
checked by a few people, so there will be very few errors'. My reply is, 'yes,
but I still have to read every word'! I only work on one novel at a time, so
that I can concentrate on the plot and the author's particular quirks. I reckon
it to take me approximately 10 days.
There are many people advertising
proofreading services. How can a writer sort the good from the bad?
You're
right, there are so many people advertising themselves as proofreaders these
days, and many of them appear to have just started. I notice that I am followed
on Twitter by newbie proofreaders every day. Here are a couple of blog posts I
wrote, which I hope will be of help to anyone looking for a proofreader, and
not knowing where to start:
So,
as my final word, dear authors – take all the time you need when choosing a
proofreader!
Thank you, Wendy, for inviting me to have my say. I did enjoy it.
You're very welcome. It's been lovely having you as a guest.
You can contact Julia through her website here or on Twitter here
